April 19, 2024
There has been a great deal written this week about prejudice.
To even suggest locking up half of humanity because of the actions of criminals is to criminalise people because of who they are and the anatomy with which they were born.
To even suggest locking up half of humanity because of the actions of criminals is to criminalize people because of who they are and the anatomy with which they were born.

There has been a great deal written this week about prejudice. One remark that might have been said in private about the skin colour of a baby is enough to condemn an unnamed member of the Royal family. But while all prejudices are equal some prejudices are more equal than others. Some prejudices indeed are not merely acceptable but are expressed by all right-thinking people.

A Green Party Peer Baroness Jones has suggested that all men should be banned from the streets after 6 PM to make women feel a lot safer. This is in response to Sarah Everard going missing in London and the possibility that she was raped and murdered. The baroness does not know what happened to Sarah Everard. The police have a suspect, but he has not been convicted of anything. Would the baroness respond in the same way next time there was a terrorist attack in London?

Whenever there is a terrorist attack, even when it has certain characteristics, there are people on social media including the usual politicians who tell us that we must not jump to conclusions about who might have committed the crime. If later, we discover that that the terrorist was a Muslim we are continually told that we must not judge the Muslim community by the actions of this one individual. This of course is correct. Out of the whole population of Muslims living in Britain only an infinitesimally small percentage are involved in terrorism. To judge Muslims in general because of the actions of Muslim terrorists is prejudice.

Imagine if someone suggested that because a Muslim blew himself up or knifed people in the street while shouting God is great in Arabic that all Muslims should be locked up so that everyone would feel safer. This would be considered to be so outrageous that anyone who said it would be immediately thought of as worse that the most prejudiced bigot. Consider for instance Donald Trump’s response to terrorism committed by Muslims when he banned people from certain Muslim countries from travelling to America. It is unlikely that Baroness Jones thought this tolerant or acceptable. Yet she expresses a prejudice that is essentially the same, only her prejudice is acceptable.

[Interesting Read]

See Also:

(1) Scottish Election Victory Speech

(2) The free-speech crisis is not a right-wing myth

(3) ‘Shameful day for Scotland’ Fury as SNP’s bill ‘restricting free speech’ approved

(4) Brexit LIVE: SNP’s independence dream crushed – Westminster poised to take over freeports

(5) Men curfew: Mark Drakeford would consider curbs in Wales as ‘temporary intervention’ (Jack: This man is a certifiable lunatic.)

Loading